Churches may face fines for wireless mics

By Erin Roach

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Churches could face six-figure fines if they continue to use wireless microphones that operate within a spectrum the Federal Communications Commission has set aside for public safety entities.

“Certain wireless microphones have operated in frequencies that are needed for public safety. When these microphones were first designed, the frequencies they used were in between the frequencies that television stations used to broadcast television programs,” the FCC explained.

“With the completion of the digital television (DTV) transition on June 12, 2009, television stations no longer use the frequencies between 698 and 806 MHz (the 700 MHz band) for broadcast,” the FCC stated. “These frequencies are now being used by public safety entities (such as police, fire and emergency services) and by commercial providers of wireless services (such as wireless broadband services).”

If, for instance, a church is using wireless microphones during a worship service and a microphone which is powerful enough to operate outside the building causes interference to public safety workers communicating via radios, lives could be at risk.

(Photo by BP)

Therefore, as of June 12, anyone using a wireless microphone within the 700 MHz band has been ordered to vacate the frequencies. Violations will be handled on a case-by-case basis, but fines could exceed $100,000.

Churches across the Southern Baptist Convention have had to examine their microphone equipment to ensure they aren’t in violation of the FCC ban, and in many cases the cost of replacing such equipment has been significant.

“We had to replace a total of 13 microphones that were all within the frequency the FCC wanted to reserve strictly for police and ambulance services and things like that,” Curtis Brewer, associate pastor of worship and celebration at First Baptist Church in Odessa, Texas, said. “It cost us about $13,000 to replace those microphones.”

Brewer said he uses at least 20 wireless microphones each Sunday with praise teams, special speakers, the pastor, baptisms and other components of the worship service.

“And then from time to time, when it fits appropriately within the service, we’ll go into the congregation with wireless microphones and get people to comment on a particular topic that we’ve touched on or to lead in prayer at a specific time or to have a testimony from someone who’s not physically able to get to the platform. So we just run all over the place with those wireless microphones,” Brewer told Baptist Press.

First Baptist was prepared for the switchover in June because they knew it was coming about a year and a half in advance, Brewer said.

“Once we knew that it was coming, we began to set money aside. When we knew that it was going to cost us this much money, we were able to buy it in sections because not only did you have to get the microphones but we were responsible for getting of course the receivers and the transmitters,” Brewer said.

Even though the wireless microphones the church used in the 700 MHz band are of good quality and still work well, they are of no use under the FCC’s new regulation.

“I know that there are some in our town that aren’t quite as fortunate as we are that have had to totally do away with wireless microphones and go back to cable mics,” Brewer said. “So there are other options instead of having to replace, but we’ve just been blessed to be able to make the replacements happen.”

Churches are advised to determine whether the wireless microphones they use are in violation of the FCC’s ban on the 700 MHz range. Typically, a number followed by MHz appears on the back or side of the receiver, and if it falls between 698 and 806 MHz, it needs to be set aside.

If church leaders are unsure whether their equipment meets the new standard, they can visit to view a manufacturer’s list of microphones and whether they comply.

One indication that a microphone is in violation of the ban is if a church is experiencing interference when using the wireless device.

“Typically, if they’re receiving interference, then they’re also causing it,” Matthew Nodine of the FCC’s Wireless Communications Bureau said.

Kent Margraves of Sennheiser Electronic Corporation, a microphone manufacturer, told Your Church, a publication of Christianity Today, that in most cases, churches don’t use a large number of wireless microphones each week. If they are only needed for larger events such as concerts and pageants, churches may consider renting wireless devices for those occasions if money is not available to replace the entire collection.

Erin Roach is a staff writer for Baptist Press.

Copyright © 1999-2010, Southern Baptist Convention.


One Response to Churches may face fines for wireless mics

  1. Karl Winkler says:

    This article brings up some good points. Keep in mind that A) this was known for nearly a decade before the deadline finally came on June 12, 2010. In fact, it was pushed back twice before it was finally set in stone. Trade publications and wireless microphone manufacturers did their best to inform everyone of the coming change, but many users of these systems did not get the message until earlier this year. Some manufacturers still offer rebates towards the purchase of new systems. Lectrosonics, for instance, will modify your equipment back to 5 years old at a nominal price for the labor and parts. Kent’s comment about renting microphones for larger events is a good suggestion. Keep in mind that the manufacturers have had to go through this transition as well, investing in new technology, new tooling, and plenty of support. We’re here to help you – don’t hesitate to ask.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: